FM Preface. The purpose of this manual is to describe the fundamentals of intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB). It describes IPB, its use in. provide extensive information about FM ( ). 10 Dec Current doctrine accepts that goal, as reflected in FM “IPB is an analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainty con-.
|Published (Last):||10 March 2016|
|PDF File Size:||16.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
IPB contributes to complete staff synchronization and the successful completion of several other staff processeswhich are described below.
Whenever possible, he plans and arranges direct dissemination of targeting intelligence from the collector to the targeting cell or appropriate tire support element FSE. Sign In Sign Out. He also prepares event templates and matrices that focus intelligence collection on identifying which COA the threat will execute.
IPB is a systematic, continuous process of analyzing the threat and environment in a specific geographic area. They also determine the specific intelligence required to support each decision and record it onto fm 34-130 list of proposed intelligence requirements. The decision making process is fm 34-130 dynamic and fm 34-130 process. The details 34-1300 tools fm 34-130 are the basis of an effective intelligence 34-13 plan.
Therefore, staffs should ensure they use IPB, wargaming, and intelligence synchronization as dynamic tools rather than vm one-time events. The commander bases his initial intelligence requirements on the critical gaps identified during IPB in the mission analysis step of the decision making process.
He also approves the list of intelligence requirements associated with that COA and identities the most important as priority intelligence requirements PIR. Fm 34-130 collection manager uses these additional tools to ensure that the collection plan stays synchronized with the command’s operations. A brief overview of each function is fm 34-130 below. Figure shows this wargaming. When the commander selects a particular friendly COA, he also fm 34-130 and prioritizes the supporting intelligence requirements.
Finally, the commander leads the IPB effort. Each function in the process is performed continuously to ensure that IPB is a continuous process which consists of four steps which you perform each time you conduct IPB:. The IPB process is continuous.
Using the results of staff wargaming and IPB as a guide, they decide The intelligence estimate forms the basis for the facts and assumptions of the decision making process, driving the other staff estimates and the remaining steps in the fm 34-130 making process. Enter Your Email Address. At this level it requires little formal education beyond realistic field training exercises 34-13 against a “savvy” enemy. IPB supports further development of requirements by identifying the activity which will satisfy each requirement and where and fm 34-130 34-1130 activity is expected fm 34-130 occur.
IPB fm 34-130 the basis for intelligence direction and synchronization that supports the command’s chosen COA. It is the application of battlefield common sense.
Generally, these are analyzed in more detail for areas within the command’s area of operations AO fm 34-130 battle space than for other areas in the AI.
FM Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield – Introduction
He bases the AI’s limits on the amount of time estimated to complete the command’s mission and the location and nature of the characteristics of the battlefield which will influence the operation. The enemy COA models developed in step 4 are the products that the staff will use to portray the threat in the decision making and targeting fm 34-130. IPB identifies facts and assumptions about the battlefield environment and the threat. The event matrix describes fm 34-130 indicators associated with the activity.
Collection management synchronizes the activities of organizations and systems to provide intelligence the commander needs to accomplish his COA and targeting efforts. A division staffs IPB can produce Fm 34-130 shows an example attack guidance matrix. Sometimes the battle will progress in a direction unanticipated during the initial IPB and wargaming. Refined and updated requirements result fm 34-130 staff wargaming and selection of a particular friendly COA.
This guidance generates additional intelligence requirements in support of each potential friendly COA the targeting process supports.
This evaluation focuses on the general capabilities of each force until COAs are developed in later steps of the IPB process. Doctrine Versus Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. For a complete discussion of the targeting process, see FM IPB identities fm 34-130 facts and assumptions about the battlefield and fm 34-130 threat that allow effective staff planning.
FM discusses intelligence synchronization and the collection management process in detail. The products developed during IPB are fm 34-130 critical to this cycle and the staff planning effort that it is a distinct function.
Given what the threat normally prefers to do, and the effects of the specific environment in which he is operating now, what are his likely fm 34-130 and the COAs available to him? Step 2 evaluates the effects of fm 34-130 environment with which both sides must contend.