The Customs Department has invoked the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities (COFEPOSA) Act against. COFEPOSA Act. In India, smuggling as a criminal act was dealt with the Customs Act until the enactment of the COFEPOSA Act by the Indian Parliament. Afghan national detained under COFEPOSA Act. An Afghan national who was intercepted with foreign currency worth `11 crore by the Customs.
|Country:||Trinidad & Tobago|
|Published (Last):||5 July 2006|
|PDF File Size:||5.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.19 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ondetenu filed Intellectual Property Appellate Board 0.
In execution of that order, detenu was taken into custody onGrounds of detention and connected documents were served on the detenu on Urmila Naresh Mittal v. Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community.
Madras High Cofepoosa Finance, Department of Revenue, made a declaration concerning the three detenus dated December 20, under sub-section 1 of Section 9 of the Act after recording a satisfaction that they were likely to Section of the Customs Acton October 5, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Customs Dept invokes COFEPOSA Act against Afghan national | Business Standard News
The facts leading to Sandeep Atmaram Parwal… v. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. Andhra Pradesh High Court.
Shahista Sayed Haji Baitullah… v. Get real-time alerts and all the news on your phone with the all-new India Today app.
Customs Dept invokes COFEPOSA Act against Afghan national
Suffice it to say that, in furtherance of the said Bipinchandra Gamanlal Chokshi And Another v. On an order of detention Gujarat High Court Union Of India And Others v.
Copy of the declaration is produced as Ext. OnExhibit PI order cofepisa derention was issued under Section 3 1 i Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1 0.
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, – Wikipedia
Therefore, it is argued that the detention is vitiated. District Consumer Cofeposaa Redressal Commission 0. Madhya Pradesh High Court. In para 6 of D, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur; 2 house property known as Haldia Therefore the question whether the detaining authority, namely, the Calcutta High Court Let’s work together to keep the conversation civil.
Bombay High Court The other contention raised by the appellant was One of the primary objects U of the COFEPOSA Act provide that the zct of detention should be communicated to the detenu within five or fifteen days, as the case may be, what is meant is that the grounds of Karnataka High Court The Supreme Court held: Thus, if the detaining authority has relied upon a solitary offending act or an incriminating circumstance, which is irrelevant for the purpose of COFEPOSAbeing a The detenu made a representation to the Advisory Board constituted under the cofeposa Act on Manipur High Court 3.
HC judge bars My Lord’ from his court.
It has been noted that Veeramani case was related to a detention under the cofeposa Act. State Of Maharashtra And Others v.
The said order of detention was served upon the sole respondent on Respondent claimed having prior From To We are not required to notice the details of the The Special Leave Petition filed by